← Back to Thinking

Attention is not the same as action

A striking website does one job well: it makes people stop and look. That's worth something. But looking isn't buying, and no business gets paid for attention.

Plenty of good-looking sites convert poorly, and plenty of plain ones convert well. The difference usually isn't the polish. It's whether the path from arrival to action holds together — or quietly breaks somewhere the design never touches.

The leak is usually after the click

Trace an actual enquiry backwards and the leaks tend to show up in order:

Any one of those quietly drains the spend. Redesigning the homepage fixes none of them, because none of them were the homepage.

What to check before you rebuild

Before paying for a new site, put the current one through three plain tests:

Those answers tell you whether you have a design problem or a path problem. They're rarely the same thing, and only one of them is solved by a redesign.

Sometimes the leak isn't on the website at all — it's what happens to the lead afterwards: no follow-up, no owner, no system to catch it. That's an operations question, not a design one. SigmaSync's piece on where the money actually leaks after the click is worth reading before you sign off a rebuild.

How MPS approaches this

MPS treats the site as one link in a path, not the whole thing. Message, page, next step, and the reply that follows — all built to hold together, so the traffic you're paying for converts instead of leaking away.

It starts with a scoping conversation to find where the current path breaks — and whether the fix is the page, or everything around it.